Adoption of SOFR over LIBOR – Indian Context
By Admin Trade Finance February 18, 2022
Adoption of SOFR over LIBOR – Indian Context

Leaving LIBOR is seen as a Land Mark Transition

As we know the underlying market that LIBOR seeks to reflect has become increasingly less active and therefore in 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that it would no longer induce or compel member panel banks to provide LIBOR quote post 2021 and that the participants in the market should expect the discontinuation.

As we know most of our International trade deals are transacted in USD and the discontinuation of LIBOR and utilizing SOFR for USD may seem to a new concept to be accepted post 2021. But, what is SOFR and How does it differ from LIBOR is a question

On 5th March, 2021, the FCA announced the cessation of 1 week USD, 2 month USD, GBP, EUR, CHF and JPY LIBOR after 31st December, 2021. The other LIBOR sets to be ceased publication after 30th June, 2023. As per the supervisory guidance by The Federal Reserve Board (FRB) and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), New contracts entering before the end of 2021, should utilize a reference rate other than LIBOR or have a robust fallback language that includes a well-defined Alternative Reference Rate (ARR).

Risk Free Rates (RFRs) are Alternative Reference Rates that have been developed instead of LIBOR which include Secured Overnight Funding Rate (SOFR) for USD, Sterling Overnight Index Average (SONIA) for GBP, Euro Short Term Rate (ESTR) for EURO, Swiss Average Overnight Rate (SARON) for CHF, Tokyo Overnight Average Rate (TONA) for YEN.

SOFR inherently differs from LIBOR. While LIBOR, which is administered by ICE Benchmarks Administration, is an unsecured reference rate submitted by panel banks with different maturities and built-in credit risk, SOFR is an overnight, secured reference rate administered by the New York Fed that broadly measures the cost of borrowing cash overnight with U.S. Treasuries as collateral – also known as the repurchase market.

Indian Context

Exposures to LIBOR arise from loan contracts (e.g. External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs)) linked to LIBOR; FCNR (B) deposits with floating rates of interest linked to LIBOR; and derivatives linked to LIBOR or to the MIFOR - a domestic benchmark based on LIBOR.

Regulator (RBI) preliminary estimated about $50 billion of debt contracts in the form of ECB/FCCBs and $281 billion of derivative contracts will expire beyond 2021, as on March 2020. These figures are, however, not static as new contracts referencing LIBOR continue to be signed.

In addition, there are Government exposures linked to LIBOR. These include LIBOR-referenced loans availed by the Government from multilateral / bilateral agencies and Lines of Credit offered to other countries. A large number of trade contracts also reference LIBOR but most of these are short term and existing contracts may not continue after the cessation of LIBOR.

The Reserve Bank has been participating in and monitoring global developments related to LIBOR transition and has tasked the Indian Banks’ Association (IBA) to consult on relevant issues. The IBA has since formed three workstreams on (i) LIBOR transition arrangements, (ii) rates and methodology and (iii) outreach to market participants.

In India, MIFOR – which has LIBOR as one of its components – is a key benchmark used in the interest rate swap (IRS) markets. An alternate benchmark based on global ARRs will need to be developed in place of the MIFOR. At present, the Clearing Corporation of India Limited provides guaranteed settlement for IRS contracts that reference the MIFOR. The clearing and settlement arrangements will also need to be modified to provide for the alternate benchmark.

A regulators scrutiny of existing loan/derivative contracts show that contractual fallback clauses catering to cessation of LIBOR are not available in existing contracts, which will continue beyond 2021. Fallback clauses customized to domestic markets but based on global practices will, therefore, need to be developed. These contracts may have to adopt the country specific ARR as a substitute once LIBOR ceases to exist, beyond 2021.

Alternative reference rates have been identified in major jurisdictions, but development of liquidity markets in these rates – a sine quo non for ensuring smooth transition - remains at a nascent stage. The FSB has laid out a global transition roadmap for LIBOR, emphasising that firms should be in a position to assess their LIBOR exposures and encouraging firms to adhere to the ISDA protocol for the transition. The FSB has also suggested that by end-2020, firms should be in a position to offer non-LIBOR linked loans to their customers. Achieving this roadmap will, however, require significant efforts from all stakeholders.

The transition arrangements for a benchmark embedded in the financial system involve multiple stakeholders across market bodies, regulators, governmental agencies and financial entities. A coordinated approach will be necessary to enable the smooth transition from LIBOR.

Whether Indian Banks have adopted SOFR based pricing for Trade Finance?

Axis Bank and ICICI Bank were among the first few lenders to execute SOFR-linked transactions in few cases. PSU Banks still follow LIBOR Based financing contracts with an option to transit in case of cessation of LIBOR.

Recently, HSBC has executed its maiden trade finance deal linked to secured overnight financing rate (SOFR) in India, joining a select group of local banks that have explored this new interest rate benchmark identified as an alternative to London interbank offered rate or Libor.

The documentary credit—a way of payment that protects both the exporter and the importer in a trade finance deal—has been discounted for a period of close to three years using SOFR. This also marks HSBC’s first project financing in the solar energy segment in India. The bank however did not divulge the size of the deal citing customer secrecy.

Pace of International Adoption

J.P. Morgan is providing leadership in this landmark transition, chairing the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), a group of industry participants convened by the Federal Reserve Board.

The Alternative Reference Rate Committee (ARRC) chose SOFR because it is completely transaction based which reflects the cost of secured funding across variety of participants in the market. As SOFR is an overnight rate, the market needs to model a term structure with different maturities to reflect expectations about where interest rates will be in the future which will allow the corporate sectors borrowing loans to predict payment in 3 month period. For both accounting and operational reasons, many loans and securities are indexed off of 1-month, 3-month and 12-month points on the curve.

Forward to 2022, LIBOR shall continue on to the middle of 2023 but the borrowings on transact using LIBOR rates shall continue only for Risk measures and Reduction Process and not for other transactions.

Other Banks may follow the suit or adopt a more resilient benchmark going forward is a Key monitorable.

References / Useful links:

1.      RBI Article: “Libor: The Rise and the Fall” https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Bulletin/PDFs/6LIBORTHERISEE3D392AFFB274D638E86916FEDFA86C3.PDF

2.      Term SOFR Rates (Reference table): https://www.cmegroup.com/market-data/cme-group-benchmark-administration/term-sofr.html

3.      News Article: https://m.economictimes.com/industry/banking/finance/banking/hsbc-executes-its-first-sofr-linked-trade-financing-with-brookfield-renewable/amp_articleshow/88145307.cms

4.      Industry Developments Internationally by J. P. Morgan https://www.jpmorgan.com/solutions/cib/markets/leaving-libor